The Case for VAR: Fairness and Accuracy
Proponents argue that VAR brings much-needed objectivity to high-stakes decisions. Goals, penalties, and red cards are now subject to review, reducing the impact of human error.
Key Benefits:
Correcting Mistakes: Wrongly disallowed goals and unjust red cards can now be overturned.
Encouraging Fair Play: Players know they’re being watched from all angles — potentially reducing simulation and off-the-ball fouls.
More Just Outcomes: In major tournaments, where a single decision can decide a nation’s fate, getting it right matters.
Examples:
The 2018 World Cup saw several VAR interventions that led to more accurate calls, including penalties that referees initially missed.
The Criticism: Killing the Flow and Passion
For all its benefits, VAR has also disrupted what makes football thrilling — spontaneity, emotion, and rhythm.
Main Issues:
Delays: Celebrations are paused. Players and fans wait, unsure whether a goal will stand.
Inconsistency: Despite replays, decisions still vary — handballs and offsides remain subjective.
Overreach: Critics argue VAR interferes too much, reviewing borderline infractions that referees might’ve ignored.
Emotional Toll:
There’s nothing quite like a last-minute winner — but VAR often adds a layer of uncertainty, with fans hesitant to cheer until confirmation arrives. This has arguably sterilized some of the game’s most powerful moments.
Where It Works — and Where It Doesn’t
Effective In:
Clear offside calls using semi-automated tech
Factual errors like mistaken identity or obvious fouls
Problematic In:
Subjective decisions (handball, “clear and obvious” contact)
Games with poor camera angles or insufficient replay clarity
Is It the System or the Execution?
Many argue the concept of VAR isn’t flawed — but how it’s implemented is. Some leagues use it better than others. Transparency, communication, and referee training play a major role in making VAR less disruptive and more trustworthy.
Solutions Moving Forward:
Faster Reviews: Streamline decision-making to reduce waiting time
Better Communication: Announce decisions clearly (like rugby or NFL)
Limited Scope: Focus on major, obvious incidents — not micromanaging every touch
Final Verdict?
VAR isn’t going anywhere — but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. Like any tool, its impact depends on how it’s used. For VAR to truly help the beautiful game, it must serve the flow and fairness of football — not fight it.
Technology should clarify, not complicate. When used with restraint, transparency, and consistency, VAR can be a force for good. Until then, the debate will rage on — in pubs, press rooms, and penalty boxes worldwide.
